<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Government forces GPS Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gpssystems.net/australian-government-forces-gps-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gpssystems.net/australian-government-forces-gps-systems/</link>
	<description>Your GPS Resource from Telogis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:25:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Garmin 255w GPS</title>
		<link>http://gpssystems.net/australian-government-forces-gps-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Garmin 255w GPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpssystems.net/?p=82#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Great write up - five stars. I bookmarked this page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up &#8211; five stars. I bookmarked this page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://gpssystems.net/australian-government-forces-gps-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpssystems.net/?p=82#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I would not say that either GPS to GSM is better as they perform completely different functions. GPS will provide location details and GSM is best used for communicating this GPS information to a central management location like in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telogis.com/ontrack&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Telogis OnTrack&lt;/a&gt;.  GSM can perform triangulation to get a location fix in areas where not enough satellites can be found for an accurate GPS fix but this will not work in areas of low mobile coverage. GPS and GSM however work hand in hand to provide a robust tracking solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not say that either <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> to GSM is better as they perform completely different functions. <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> will provide location details and GSM is best used for communicating this <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> information to a central management location like in <a href="http://www.telogis.com/ontrack" rel="nofollow">Telogis OnTrack</a>.  GSM can perform triangulation to get a location fix in areas where not enough satellites can be found for an accurate <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> fix but this will not work in areas of low mobile coverage. <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> and GSM however work hand in hand to provide a robust tracking solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: portable gps tracker</title>
		<link>http://gpssystems.net/australian-government-forces-gps-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>portable gps tracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gpssystems.net/?p=82#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this blog very intriguing - surveillance is everyplace, regarding the tracking what&#039;s best GPS or GSM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this blog very intriguing &#8211; surveillance is everyplace, regarding the tracking what&#8217;s best <acronym title="Global Positioning System">GPS</acronym> or GSM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
